I've recently bought the Metal Gear Ac!d game for the Sony PSP system inspite of bad reviews from various review sites.
I'm glad I took the risk and went ahead and bought the game anyway because I ended up loving it. Metal Gear Ac!d use of card playing technique in a strategic game environment is refreshing. Granted, the game mechanic of a card/strategy turn-based game is not as visually stunning or fast pace as the PS2 format where you move the character in a real time 3D environment but it requires just the same amount of thinking and strategy to play the game.
So the lesson here is one may read reviews to get a sense on the quality of any given game but if you want to try something new, take a chance and try it regardless of the reviews. I'm glad I did.
I've played both metal gear 3, and splinter cell 3 and in the end it was splinter that i prefered. Although it didn't have as many levels as i would have liked, it still had much better graphics then metal gear as well as a better view (I kept getting confused with mg's views) It had some talking in it but you could still do stuff during the talking where as in MG you had to wait while they went on and on about all this crap that didn't matter. But i guess when it comes down to it it's your personal preference.
Posted by: Dave | Monday, January 30, 2006 at 01:14 PM
I've played both metal gear 3, and splinter cell 3 and in the end it was splinter that i prefered. Although it didn't have as many levels as i would have liked, it still had much better graphics then metal gear as well as a better view (I kept getting confused with mg's views) It had some talking in it but you could still do stuff during the talking where as in MG you had to wait while they went on and on about all this crap that didn't matter. But i guess when it comes down to it it's your personal preference.
Posted by: Dave | Monday, January 30, 2006 at 01:12 PM