Fotologue Member
The beta test site is finally up for English registration. Love the site for its full use of Flash technology to serve up photos in large scale. You could see mine from
The beta test site is finally up for English registration. Love the site for its full use of Flash technology to serve up photos in large scale. You could see mine from
About a year ago when I was looking for a DSLR camera, there were 2 sensor sizes available in the market. There is the small sized format sensor DX or 4/3 standards (similar to the APS film equivalent), where the captured images has a crop effect of 1.5 to 2.0 times using any of the standard 35mm lenses. The other sensor size has the same size and dimension as a 35mm film. The key reason I went with the Nikon D70, which has the APS size format, because of the price. Most of the APS sensor size DSLR on the market are within the 1,000 to 2,000 price range, but the 35mm full frame (few in models) DSLR cost 10,000 or more - one being Canon's EOS-1Ds Mark II. The problem of using any APS sized sensor DSLR with 35mm lenses is that it cuts out 1/3 of the images because of the crop factor, so you're not using the entire glass to frame you picture, which is a shame for any group or wide-angle shots.
Canon has recently announced a new camera (available late in the Fall this year) called EOS 5D that has a 35mm full frame sensor; it created a big commotion in the pro-consumer community because of its price and size. The suggested retail price is around 3,200 USD (about 5,000 CDN), though it is not cheap, it's more affordable than Canon's professional Mark II. It has the size and weight similar to the 350D as well, which is light enough to bring on a trip. So, this beg the question that 35mm sensor DSLR is becoming more affordable in the future with Canon setting the bar on EOS 5D's price, size and weight. In time, it may reach the same price range as the current APS sensor DSLR, but having to stay with Nikon because of the lenses that I invested, I wish Nikon will invest the time and money to produce a full frame sensor someday. Hopefully soon, before Canon has the 35mm full-frame sensor market all to itself with the EOS 5D.
I've just found a very cool site called, Fotologue, from Japan to share photos on-line. The site uses Flash extensively for its presentation and layout. If you have the connection speed (DSL connection at a minimum), it's amazing to see your photos in large format on the web - it literally take up your entire screen. There are alot of artistic shots in the submitted photos; you could learn alot on the Japanese culture from the photos and it's a pleasure to browser through them. Here are a few that I like: Rayon Bleu, 6 Strings, Flow, and Your Eyes.
Unfortunately, the site is written entirely in Japanese, but I'll get to the bottom of it to see if I can sign in and start sharing my photos. I might need someone who speaks Japanese to help me out understanding the site.
Latest Updates - Apparently, it's a site on member's invitation only. Initially, one can post a limited amount of pictures there and the members would vote on what they like or dislike, and if the hosting company or any site member likes your work, you'll be given a invitation to become a standard member. Sounds like an exclusive club limited to few.
If you’re
in the market for a camera, there are two choices that you can choose between
the traditional camera that uses film, and the new digital camera that uses a memory
card. In many ways, both types of camera share similar hardware technologies
such as the use of the shutter release to take a picture, the lens to focus the
subject, and the aperture to control the light. However, the cost, picture
quality, and convenience of the two will determine which type of camera you decide
to use or buy.
The initial
cost of the film camera is in the camera body, lenses, and films. After you’ve
taken your first roll of film, you must develop it to view your photos. The
cost of similar class digital camera is almost the same, but instead of buying
films, one must invest quite a bit more for the memory card to store the photos.
With the newer digital cameras that can take large mega-pixels photos, larger
memory is needed to store the large image files. So, the initial cost of
digital camera will most likely be more expensive. However, In film
development, one must develop the entire roll of film, regardless if the photos
taken were any good. Statistically, only 10 percent of the photos taken are
kept. Therefore, the real cost of using film camera is in the photo development,
substantially more compared to the one time cost of buying the camera. On the
other hand, one can save a lot by using a digital camera because the pictures
are previewed beforehand, and only the good photos get printed. In terms of archiving
your “Kodak moments”, this film technology will cost you quite a bit from
expensive framing to scanning the negatives. But digital photos can easily be
archived using recordable media such as DVDs or computer hard-drives with
minimal cost.
There have
been many articles and arguments on the subject of digital camera not being
able to produce the same quality prints as the traditional film, but the
advancement in technology has shortened that gap substantially. With the 35mm film
media, one can produce sharp quality prints, up to an A4 size paper. On the
other hand, with the new 12 mega-pixel digital cameras, one can easily print up
to poster size print with minimal effort. Most of the film camera, ranged from
the point & shoot to the professional SLR (Single Lens Reflex) models, can
produce reasonable quality photo prints. However, not all digital cameras can
produce quality prints. Digital cameras in cell phones or Palm like PDA
(Personal Digital Agenda) devices will only give mediocre quality picture intended
only for sharing and sending via email. So, to get quality images from the
digital format, one must look into the mid-range to high-end models. Eventually,
it’s a matter of time before the digital format will surpass the larger 50mm
film used for wedding or glamour shots on sharpness and billboard scale
reproduction.
With the widely
accepted standard of 35mm film used in the traditional camera, one can easily
buy extra rolls of film anywhere to use while on a vacation. On the other hand,
it’s not so easy to buy a memory card for the digital camera if it’s full. One
needs to transfer the images taken in the memory card to either a notebook back
in the hotel, or invest in a portable hard-drive media to download the photos
before you can take more pictures using the same memory card. One may buy more
memory cards to bring on a trip but it’s very costly and not practical. Luckily,
there are many selections of portable hard-drives to choose from; even Apple’s
new iPod can store images.
A famous journalist
photographer once said, “It’s not how well you can take a picture, but rather
having a camera with you at all times to capture the unexpected.” The size of a
35mm camera can be reduced so far, due to the size of the film cartridge. However,
with advancements in micro-technology, there are multitudes of ultra-thin
digital cameras that can easily fit in your shirt pocket, making them
convenient to carry anywhere. When you’re on a vacation, it is very important
that the shots you’ve taken are properly focused and exposed. With the film
camera, there is no instant view feedback on how your shots turned out until
the film is developed. These shots might have been out of focus and it’s too
late to take another afterward. However, one can instantly see the photos taken
through the LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) that most digital cameras have to see
if the shot was taken successfully. If not, one can take another shot on the
spot, and there is no cost for bad photos in the digital format because they
can easily be deleted. Individuals who like to enlarge, to manipulate, or to
fix over-exposed or under-exposed photos, need to use different types of
equipment and chemicals with the film in the darkroom. However, it’s a lot
easier to fix or manipulate digital photos using computer software such as
Photo Elements for beginners to Photoshop for the professionals.
Despite the
differences, one can apply his/her skills in photography in either the film or
digital format. With the ability to pack up to 22 mega-pixels resolutions in
the high-end digital camera, both types of format will give great results in
photo prints. But the cost and convenience will determine if you should get a
film or a digital camera. With the introduction of the Canon Digital Rebel and
Nikon D70, the prices of digital SLR cameras are very affordable. Professionally
speaking, the most expensive investment is in the lenses. Quality lenses can
range from a few hundred dollars to thousands, if not more. The good news is
that camera manufactures were kind enough to have the same lens mount in the
digital SLR camera as the traditional film SLR camera. Thus, one can use all of
the old SLR lenses on the digital SLR body without any problem. Therefore, an
investment in lenses used in the film camera is not lost.
I've sold my Nikon 50mm f1.8 D prime lens to my brother so he can take great portrait photos with his recently purchased D70 of his family and friends. It is a great lens with a great price. The 50mm f1.8 D street price in Toronto is about 170CDN and that is a bargain in the SLR lens world for a fast prime at f1.8 stop.
Now that my brother took ownership of my departed fast f1.8 prime lens, I have a choice to get between an even faster lens, the 50mm f1.4 or the 35mm f2.0. They are both in the same price, the 50mm being faster than the 35mm by one stop while less wide. I've read various forums and the consensus amount users of both lenses are they are both great lenses but the deciding factor is the 50mm is great for portrait shots and the 35mm is great for group shots.
As the title implies, I finally decided to get the Nikon 50mm f1.4 D lens because at the end of the day, I'm looking for a portrait lens but I paid quite a bit more for an extra stop. So I'll be testing it very soon and see what the extra stop will give me. Stay tune for the latest updates in my photo album portfolio section with shots of this exciting lens.
Updates on May 2, 2005: I've added two images in my photo albums using the new lens. Have a look under Interesting Shots and Nanocube Aquarium.
Cheers,
Wuju nonono!